Show / Hide Files

Lubin V. Panish (1972)

 

Case Details

Docket Number: 71-6852
Case Term: 1972

Justices Involved

Justice William O. Douglas
Justice Byron R. White
Justice Potter Stewart
Justice Lewis F. Powell
Justice Harry A. Blackmun
Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.
Justice Thurgood Marshall
Justice William H. Rehnquist

Download PDF
Download Documents PDF

Document 1

From: William O. Douglas
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 20th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 2

From: Byron R. White
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 23rd, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 3

From: Potter Stewart
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 23rd, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 4

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 24th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 5

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 24th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 6

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 24th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 7

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 25th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 8

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: William O. Douglas
Copied: Conference
On: April 26th, 1973
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information