Show / Hide Files

Ohio Civil Rights Commission V. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc. (1985)

 

Document 1

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Sanda Day O'Connor
On: March 25th, 1986
Action: Attached Material Relevant to a Case
This may include memos about maps or pictures that will be incorporated in opinion; cover memo to circulation of some relevant non-case material for an opinion (e.g., newspaper article, related lower court opinion); memos may mention extra-court material that might be relevant (e.g., congressional hearings, a statute, other opinions that are somehow (perhaps tangentially) related to case at hand); circulation of clerk’s memo about case

Document 2

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: May 1st, 1986
Action: Cover Memo to Majority Opinion or Per Curiam Opinion
This includes a cover memo to memorandum opinion if written by the assigned author; cover memo to changes to majority opinion

Document 3

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: May 1st, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 4

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 1st, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 5

From: John Paul Stevens
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 2nd, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author
Action: Await Dissent
Justice indicates that he or she awaits a dissenting opinion, including opinions that dissent in part

Document 6

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 2nd, 1986
Action: Endorse Another Justice's Suggestion
Memos where a justice states agreement with another justice's suggestion to the majority opinion author (e.g., I am about where Justice X is, agree with Justice X's letter to you, I have no problem with Justice X's suggestion, agree with another justice's comment, is Justice X's suggestion ok with you). The identity of the justice whose suggestion is endorsed is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 7

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 5th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.
Action: Suggestion before Majority Opinion Circulated
Justice makes a suggestion or lays out position in the case before the majority opinion is circulated; discussion of issues before an opinion has been drafted; memo laying out other justice's position or describing how other justices’ have voted so far in the case; lays out position without directing it at a circulating opinion

Document 8

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 5th, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author

Document 9

From: Warren E. Burger
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Byron R. White, Lewis F. Powell, Sanda Day O'Connor
On: May 5th, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author

Document 10

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 6th, 1986
Action: Endorse Another Justice's Suggestion
Memos where a justice states agreement with another justice's suggestion to the majority opinion author (e.g., I am about where Justice X is, agree with Justice X's letter to you, I have no problem with Justice X's suggestion, agree with another justice's comment, is Justice X's suggestion ok with you). The identity of the justice whose suggestion is endorsed is located in the JOINED variable.
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author

Document 11

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: May 7th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion Author's Response
May be response to a suggestion, reservation, or a separate opinion; may also say that author will respond to another opinion; may state majority opinion author's change to opinion that was not prompted by another justice; may indicate that the opinion is different from the conference discussion; may be a circulation of a portion of the opinion (a footnote, multiple pages without circulating the whole opinion); may be a suggestion from the majority opinion author regarding several options for changing majority opinion; may be a suggestion from the author for a change that could be made to opinion

Document 12

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Warren E. Burger
Copied: Byron R. White, Lewis F. Powell, Sanda Day O'Connor
On: May 8th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion Author's Response
May be response to a suggestion, reservation, or a separate opinion; may also say that author will respond to another opinion; may state majority opinion author's change to opinion that was not prompted by another justice; may indicate that the opinion is different from the conference discussion; may be a circulation of a portion of the opinion (a footnote, multiple pages without circulating the whole opinion); may be a suggestion from the majority opinion author regarding several options for changing majority opinion; may be a suggestion from the author for a change that could be made to opinion

Document 13

From: Byron R. White
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 8th, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author

Document 14

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Sanda Day O'Connor
On: May 9th, 1986
Action: Endorse Another Justice's Suggestion
Memos where a justice states agreement with another justice's suggestion to the majority opinion author (e.g., I am about where Justice X is, agree with Justice X's letter to you, I have no problem with Justice X's suggestion, agree with another justice's comment, is Justice X's suggestion ok with you). The identity of the justice whose suggestion is endorsed is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 15

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Lewis F. Powell
On: May 12th, 1986
Action: Case Should be Reargued
Includes statement that maybe case should be reargued

Document 16

From: Warren E. Burger
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: May 27th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 17

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 10th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion Author's Response
May be response to a suggestion, reservation, or a separate opinion; may also say that author will respond to another opinion; may state majority opinion author's change to opinion that was not prompted by another justice; may indicate that the opinion is different from the conference discussion; may be a circulation of a portion of the opinion (a footnote, multiple pages without circulating the whole opinion); may be a suggestion from the majority opinion author regarding several options for changing majority opinion; may be a suggestion from the author for a change that could be made to opinion

Document 18

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: Thurgood Marshall, Harry A. Blackmun, John Paul Stevens
Copied: None
On: June 11th, 1986
Action: Disagrees with Opinion Author
Memo expresses a justice's disagreement with an opinion author's letter, proposal, or footnote

Document 19

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 16th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 20

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 19th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 21

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 19th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 22

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: June 19th, 1986
Action: Join Concurrence
Memos where a justice states that they join a concurring opinion, including joining a concurrence in part, joining a concurrence in judgment or result, or joining a concurrence at foot. The identity of the concurring opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 23

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 20th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 24

From: Byron R. White
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: June 20th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 25

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 20th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 26

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: June 23rd, 1986
Action: Join Concurrence
Memos where a justice states that they join a concurring opinion, including joining a concurrence in part, joining a concurrence in judgment or result, or joining a concurrence at foot. The identity of the concurring opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 27

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 24th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 28

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: June 25th, 1986
Action: Join Concurrence
Memos where a justice states that they join a concurring opinion, including joining a concurrence in part, joining a concurrence in judgment or result, or joining a concurrence at foot. The identity of the concurring opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 29

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 25th, 1986
Action: Proposes Disposition of Held Cases
Memo lists cases held for an opinion and gives cert votes or votes on the merits for the held cases; justice may state that held cases should be discussed at conference

Document 30

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: June 25th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result