Show / Hide Files

United States V. Mechanik (1985)

 

Document 1

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: January 14th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 2

From: Byron R. White
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: January 17th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 3

From: John Paul Stevens
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: January 17th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 4

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: January 18th, 1986
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 5

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: January 22nd, 1986
Action: Await Dissent
Justice indicates that he or she awaits a dissenting opinion, including opinions that dissent in part

Document 6

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: January 30th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 7

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: January 30th, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author
Action: Will Write Concurring Opinion
A memo where a justice states that he or she will circulate a concurring opinion draft, including that a concurring opinion will be out soon or that a revised draft of the concurring opinion will be circulated; this may also apply to opinions that concur in part or concur in the judgment or result

Document 8

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: Sanda Day O'Connor
Copied: None
On: February 3rd, 1986
Action: Suggestion to Separate Opinion
Memo states includes a justice's suggestion for a separate opinion (e.g., don't agree with reasoning of separate opinion; comment on separate opinion; will join separate opinion if; cannot join separate opinion; will be making suggestion to separate opinion). The identity of the separate opinion author who receives suggestion is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 9

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: February 10th, 1986
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 10

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William J. Brennan, Jr.
Copied: None
On: February 10th, 1986
Action: Concurring Opinion Author's Response
May be response to a suggestion, the majority opinion, another separate opinion; it may say the author made changes and see the attached opinion; it may indicate the opinion has been changed although not prompted by someone else

Document 11

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 14th, 1986
Action: Dissenting Opinion
This refers to a dissenting opinion draft, including dissents from denial of certiorari if in opinion form

Document 12

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 18th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 13

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 19th, 1986
Action: Dissenting Opinion
This refers to a dissenting opinion draft, including dissents from denial of certiorari if in opinion form

Document 14

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: Sanda Day O'Connor
Copied: Conference
On: February 19th, 1986
Action: Join Concurrence
Memos where a justice states that they join a concurring opinion, including joining a concurrence in part, joining a concurrence in judgment or result, or joining a concurrence at foot. The identity of the concurring opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 15

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 20th, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 16

From: Warren E. Burger
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 20th, 1986
Action: Concurring Opinion
This refers to a concurring opinion draft

Document 17

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: Sanda Day O'Connor
Copied: Conference
On: February 20th, 1986
Action: Join Concurrence
Memos where a justice states that they join a concurring opinion, including joining a concurrence in part, joining a concurrence in judgment or result, or joining a concurrence at foot. The identity of the concurring opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 18

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 21st, 1986
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result