Show / Hide Files

Texas V. Brown (1982)

 

Document 1

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 9th, 1983
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 2

From: Warren E. Burger
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: February 21st, 1983
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 3

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 24th, 1983
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 4

From: Byron R. White
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: February 24th, 1983
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.
Action: May Write Concurring Opinion
A memo where a justice states that he or she may (or will likely) write a concurring opinion; this also applies to opinions that concur in part, concurrences in judgment, or concurrences at foot.

Document 5

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: February 24th, 1983
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.
Action: May Write "Separate Opinion"
A memo where a justice states that he or she may (or will probably) write a "separate opinion"

Document 6

From: Byron R. White
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: February 25th, 1983
Action: Concurring Opinion
This refers to a concurring opinion draft

Document 7

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: March 9th, 1983
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 8

From: Sanda Day O'Connor
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: March 9th, 1983
Action: Join Majority Opinion
Memos where a justice joins the majority opinion includes please join me; I agree; I am still with you; I acquiesce; I will go along; I dissent but will be silent; graveyard join or dissent. This code includes join of memorandum opinions if it is written by the assigned author, orders if it disposes of case, decrees, per curiam opinions. It also includes statements that the justice joins, but subject to what others might write.

Document 9

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: None
On: March 23rd, 1983
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author

Document 10

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: March 23rd, 1983
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 11

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: Lewis F. Powell
Copied: Conference
On: March 24th, 1983
Action: Suggestion to Separate Opinion
Memo states includes a justice's suggestion for a separate opinion (e.g., don't agree with reasoning of separate opinion; comment on separate opinion; will join separate opinion if; cannot join separate opinion; will be making suggestion to separate opinion). The identity of the separate opinion author who receives suggestion is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 12

From: Harry A. Blackmun
To: William H. Rehnquist
Copied: Conference
On: March 24th, 1983
Action: Suggestion to Majority Opinion
This includes memo with broad statements including that a justice cannot join the opinion, cannot join a part of the opinion, does not agree with the opinion, or has continuing doubts with the opinion; memos that indicate that the author's change is not enough; memos that make suggestions for specific changes to majority opinion or that express reservations about some aspect of the majority opinion; this code is also given for suggestions to memorandum opinions by an assigned author
Action: Endorse Another Justice's Suggestion
Memos where a justice states agreement with another justice's suggestion to the majority opinion author (e.g., I am about where Justice X is, agree with Justice X's letter to you, I have no problem with Justice X's suggestion, agree with another justice's comment, is Justice X's suggestion ok with you). The identity of the justice whose suggestion is endorsed is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 13

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: March 25th, 1983
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 14

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 5th, 1983
Action: Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in part and dissents in part, including opinions that concur in judgment and dissent (or dissent in part), concur in judgment in part and dissent (or dissent in part), or dissent in one docket and concurs in another docket

Document 15

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 6th, 1983
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft

Document 16

From: William J. Brennan, Jr.
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: April 6th, 1983
Action: Join Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
Memos where justices state that they join an opinion that concurs in part and dissents in part; alternatively, the opinion that is joined might concur in judgment and dissent. The identity of the opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 17

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 7th, 1983
Action: Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in part and dissents in part, including opinions that concur in judgment and dissent (or dissent in part), concur in judgment in part and dissent (or dissent in part), or dissent in one docket and concurs in another docket

Document 18

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: None
On: April 8th, 1983
Action: Suggestion to Separate Opinion
Memo states includes a justice's suggestion for a separate opinion (e.g., don't agree with reasoning of separate opinion; comment on separate opinion; will join separate opinion if; cannot join separate opinion; will be making suggestion to separate opinion). The identity of the separate opinion author who receives suggestion is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 19

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Lewis F. Powell
Copied: None
On: April 11th, 1983
Action: Concurring Opinion Author's Response
May be response to a suggestion, the majority opinion, another separate opinion; it may say the author made changes and see the attached opinion; it may indicate the opinion has been changed although not prompted by someone else

Document 20

From: Thurgood Marshall
To: John Paul Stevens
Copied: Conference
On: April 12th, 1983
Action: Join Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
Memos where justices state that they join an opinion that concurs in part and dissents in part; alternatively, the opinion that is joined might concur in judgment and dissent. The identity of the opinion author who receives the join is located in the JOINED variable.

Document 21

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 12th, 1983
Action: Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in part and dissents in part, including opinions that concur in judgment and dissent (or dissent in part), concur in judgment in part and dissent (or dissent in part), or dissent in one docket and concurs in another docket

Document 22

From: John Paul Stevens
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 13th, 1983
Action: Concur in Part and Dissent in Part
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in part and dissents in part, including opinions that concur in judgment and dissent (or dissent in part), concur in judgment in part and dissent (or dissent in part), or dissent in one docket and concurs in another docket

Document 23

From: Lewis F. Powell
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 14th, 1983
Action: Concur in Judgment
This refers to an opinion draft that concurs in the judgment or result

Document 24

From: William H. Rehnquist
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: April 15th, 1983
Action: Majority Opinion
This refers to a majority opinion draft