Show / Hide Files

United States V. Vuitch (1969)

 

Case Details

Docket Number: 1155
Case Term: 1969

Justices Involved

Justice Potter Stewart
Justice Byron R. White
Justice Hugo. L. Black
Justice John M. Harlan

Download PDF
Download Documents PDF

Document 1

From: Potter Stewart
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: March 27th, 1970
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 2

From: Byron R. White
To: Conference
Copied: None
On: March 28th, 1970
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 3

From: Hugo. L. Black
To: Potter Stewart
Copied: Conference
On: March 31st, 1970
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information

Document 4

From: John M. Harlan
To: Potter Stewart
Copied: Conference
On: April 2nd, 1970
Action: Memo about Supplemental or Amicus Briefs
Justice may express views on need for additional briefs (e.g., no need for supplemental briefs); justices may discuss proposed questions for supplemental briefs; justices may discuss oral arguments, reargument, or parties' briefs (e.g., date, length, exact questions that should be presented at orals or in briefs); justices may discuss asking litigants for additional information